2019 RLLR 126
The claimant was found credible, established identity and membership of a particular social group as a bisexual Tanzanian man, demonstrated an objective risk of persecution given criminalization of same-sex activity and country conditions, and showed state protection and internal flight alternative were not reasonably available; therefore he is a Convention refugee under Section 96 of the IRPA.
- Citation
- 2019 RLLR 126
- Parties
- Claimant: [XXX]; Tribunal: Refugee Protection Division
- Court
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Convention Refugee Claim / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim accepted - claimant found to be a Convention refugee
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Particular Social Group, Internal Flight Alternative, State Protection, Sexual Orientation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[XXX]
Claimant
Refugee Protection Division
Tribunal
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Convention Refugee Claim / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether the claimant is a member of a particular social group (bisexual Tanzanian man)
- 3 Whether the claimant's testimony is credible
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was found credible, established identity and membership of a particular social group as a bisexual Tanzanian man, demonstrated an objective risk of persecution given criminalization of same-sex activity and country conditions, and showed state protection and internal flight alternative were not reasonably available; therefore he is a Convention refugee under Section 96 of the IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claim accepted - claimant found to be a Convention refugee
Orders
- Claim accepted; protection granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment