2019 RLLR 9
The principal claimant is a Convention refugee because she established membership in a particular social group (bisexual woman) and a well‑founded fear of persecution in Nigeria; the adult spouse and each minor are Convention refugees because they established a sufficient nexus to the principal claimant and face serious possibility of persecution; state protection and internal flight alternatives were found unavailable in the claimants' circumstances, and the minors face additional risk from ritual practices.
- Citation
- 2019 RLLR 9
- Parties
- Principal Claimant: [XXX]; Adult Male Claimant: [XXX]1; Eldest Minor Claimant: [XXX]2; Youngest Minor Claimant: [XXX]
- Court
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Reasons and Decision
- Outcome
- All four claims accepted; four claimants determined to be Convention refugees
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Membership of a Particular Social Group, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Child Protection and Ritual Practices, Sexual Orientation Persecution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[XXX]
Principal Claimant
[XXX]1
Adult Male Claimant
[XXX]2
Eldest Minor Claimant
[XXX]
Youngest Minor Claimant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Reasons and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principal claimant qualifies as a Convention refugee based on sexual orientation
- 2 Whether family members of the principal claimant have nexus to a Convention ground and qualify as Convention refugees
- 3 Whether state protection is available in Nigeria to the claimants
Ratio Decidendi
The principal claimant is a Convention refugee because she established membership in a particular social group (bisexual woman) and a well‑founded fear of persecution in Nigeria; the adult spouse and each minor are Convention refugees because they established a sufficient nexus to the principal claimant and face serious possibility of persecution; state protection and internal flight alternatives were found unavailable in the claimants' circumstances, and the minors face additional risk from ritual practices.
Court Disposition
All four claims accepted; four claimants determined to be Convention refugees
Orders
- Principal claimant, adult male claimant, eldest minor claimant and youngest minor claimant are Convention refugees pursuant to section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment