2019 RLLR 9

2019 RLLR 9

The principal claimant is a Convention refugee because she established membership in a particular social group (bisexual woman) and a well‑founded fear of persecution in Nigeria; the adult spouse and each minor are Convention refugees because they established a sufficient nexus to the principal claimant and face serious possibility of persecution; state protection and internal flight alternatives were found unavailable in the claimants' circumstances, and the minors face additional risk from ritual practices.

Citation
2019 RLLR 9
Parties
Principal Claimant: [XXX]; Adult Male Claimant: [XXX]1; Eldest Minor Claimant: [XXX]2; Youngest Minor Claimant: [XXX]
Court
Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Reasons and Decision
Outcome
All four claims accepted; four claimants determined to be Convention refugees
Legal Topics
Convention Refugee, Membership of a Particular Social Group, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Child Protection and Ritual Practices, Sexual Orientation Persecution
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[XXX]

Principal Claimant

[XXX]1

Adult Male Claimant

[XXX]2

Eldest Minor Claimant

[XXX]

Youngest Minor Claimant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Reasons and Decision

  1. 1 Whether the principal claimant qualifies as a Convention refugee based on sexual orientation
  2. 2 Whether family members of the principal claimant have nexus to a Convention ground and qualify as Convention refugees
  3. 3 Whether state protection is available in Nigeria to the claimants

Ratio Decidendi

The principal claimant is a Convention refugee because she established membership in a particular social group (bisexual woman) and a well‑founded fear of persecution in Nigeria; the adult spouse and each minor are Convention refugees because they established a sufficient nexus to the principal claimant and face serious possibility of persecution; state protection and internal flight alternatives were found unavailable in the claimants' circumstances, and the minors face additional risk from ritual practices.

Court Disposition

All four claims accepted; four claimants determined to be Convention refugees

Orders

  • Principal claimant, adult male claimant, eldest minor claimant and youngest minor claimant are Convention refugees pursuant to section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act