2020 RLLR 45
Claimant's identity and credible testimony were corroborated by documents and objective country evidence (including reports on the National Security Law and prosecutions of protest leaders); there is a clear nexus to political opinion, no effective state protection and no viable internal flight alternative in Hong Kong, therefore the claimant meets the definition of a Convention refugee.
- Citation
- 2020 RLLR 45
- Court
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Political Opinion, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Country Conditions (hong Kong), National Security Law
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant qualifies as a Convention refugee on ground of political opinion
- 2 Credibility of claimant's testimony and documentary evidence
- 3 Nexus between feared harm and political opinion
Ratio Decidendi
Claimant's identity and credible testimony were corroborated by documents and objective country evidence (including reports on the National Security Law and prosecutions of protest leaders); there is a clear nexus to political opinion, no effective state protection and no viable internal flight alternative in Hong Kong, therefore the claimant meets the definition of a Convention refugee.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee
Orders
- Claimant found to be a Convention refugee and refugee protection claim accepted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment