2023 RLLR 3
On the balance of probabilities the adult claimant is credible as a lesbian targeted for homophobic and gender-based persecution; documentary country evidence establishes an objective risk and systemic inability or unwillingness of Mexican authorities to protect LGBTQ+ persons and women; no viable internal flight alternative exists; the minor claimant has derivative nexus as immediate family; therefore both claimants meet the Convention refugee definition under sections 96 and 97(1) of IRPA and the claims are allowed.
- Citation
- 2023 RLLR 3
- Parties
- Claimant Adult: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Claimant Minor: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Refugee Protection Division Final Determination (merits)
- Outcome
- Claimants' refugee protection claims allowed; claimants determined to be Convention refugees
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Sexual Orientation, Gender Based Persecution, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility, Counsel Conduct
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant Adult
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant Minor
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Refugee Protection Division Final Determination (merits)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants are Convention refugees under sections 96 and 97(1) of the IRPA
- 2 Whether there is nexus to a Convention ground based on sexual orientation and gender (particular social group)
- 3 Credibility of the claimants and effect of inconsistent narratives and alleged poor legal representation
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the adult claimant is credible as a lesbian targeted for homophobic and gender-based persecution; documentary country evidence establishes an objective risk and systemic inability or unwillingness of Mexican authorities to protect LGBTQ+ persons and women; no viable internal flight alternative exists; the minor claimant has derivative nexus as immediate family; therefore both claimants meet the Convention refugee definition under sections 96 and 97(1) of IRPA and the claims are allowed.
Court Disposition
Claimants' refugee protection claims allowed; claimants determined to be Convention refugees
Orders
- Claimants are determined to be Convention refugees under the IRPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment