2022 RLLR 25
The Member found the claimants credible, established identity, and accepted nexus to Convention grounds (Ukrainian nationality; membership in particular social groups: elderly with chronic health issues and female principal claimant). Country condition evidence established an objective basis for a well-founded fear...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2022 RLLR 25
- Parties
- Principal Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Associate Claimant: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim (convention Refugee Determination) / Decision (merits) by Refugee Protection Division
- Outcome
- Claims accepted; claimants determined to be Convention refugees under section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee Determination, Nexus to Convention Grounds (nationality; Particular Social Group), State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility Assessment, Country Conditions, Gender Based Persecution, Persecution of Elderly and Medically Vulnerable Persons
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Principal Claimant
XXXX XXXX
Associate Claimant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (convention Refugee Determination) / Decision (merits) by Refugee Protection Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants face persecution on account of Ukrainian nationality and membership of particular social groups (elderly persons with chronic health issues; female claimant)
- 2 Whether claimants are credible
- 3 Whether there is an objective basis for the fear (country conditions)
Ratio Decidendi
The Member found the claimants credible, established identity, and accepted nexus to Convention grounds (Ukrainian nationality; membership in particular social groups: elderly with chronic health issues and female principal claimant). Country condition evidence established an objective basis for a well-founded fear of persecution, state protection was not operationally effective, and internal relocation was not viable. Therefore the claimants meet the definition of Convention refugees under section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Court Disposition
Claims accepted; claimants determined to be Convention refugees under section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
Orders
- Claimants granted protection as Convention refugees under section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
- No need to consider protection under section 97 given grant under section 96
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment