Clark v. City of Vancouver

Clark v. City of Vancouver

Majority held the city substantially complied with the trust and the deed must be reasonably construed; the evidence did not establish a clear breach warranting equitable forfeiture and reconveyance, therefore the appeal was dismissed and the lower court judgment affirmed.

Citation
(1904) 35 SCR 121
Parties
Appellant / Plaintiff: William C. Clark; Respondent / Defendant: The City of Vancouver
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
8 June 1904
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Supreme Court of British Columbia / Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal (final Hearing)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia affirmed
Legal Topics
Conveyance Upon Conditions, Public Park Trusts, Forfeiture for Breach of Condition, Assignment and Champerty, Maintenance and Performance Obligations
Source Language
English
Property Law Trusts Equity Conveyancing Conveyance Upon Conditions Public Park Trusts Forfeiture for Breach of Condition Assignment and Champerty +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William C. Clark

Appellant / Plaintiff

The City of Vancouver

Respondent / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Supreme Court of British Columbia / Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal (final Hearing)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the city breached the trust/conditions of the conveyance so as to trigger forfeiture and reconveyance
  2. 2 Whether an assignee of the grantor can enforce a forfeiture/right of reconveyance
  3. 3 Whether the assignment is champertous and void

Ratio Decidendi

Majority held the city substantially complied with the trust and the deed must be reasonably construed; the evidence did not establish a clear breach warranting equitable forfeiture and reconveyance, therefore the appeal was dismissed and the lower court judgment affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia affirmed