R. v. Hunter

The court was satisfied that all essential averments for Counts 1-3 were made out and therefore convicted the accused on all three counts.

Citation: 2014 BCSC 1493
Parties: Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Shae Alexander Hunter
Court: Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction: Canada
Judgment Date: 24 January 2014
Procedural Posture: Criminal / Judgment (oral Reasons for Judgment)
Outcome: Guilty on Count 1, Count 2, and Count 3.
Legal Topics: Conviction, Trial, Verdict
Source Language: English

Criminal Law Conviction Trial Verdict

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2

Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Shae Alexander Hunter

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment (oral Reasons for Judgment)

Legal Issues

1 Whether the essential averments in respect of Counts 1-3 were made out
2 Whether the accused should be convicted on Counts 1-3

Ratio Decidendi

The court was satisfied that all essential averments for Counts 1-3 were made out and therefore convicted the accused on all three counts.

Court Disposition

Guilty on Count 1, Count 2, and Count 3.

Orders

Accused found guilty on Count 1.
Accused found guilty on Count 2.