TC0-08821

TC0-08821

Despite credibility concerns, correcting the appellants' ethnicity to Amhara and considering admissible updated country condition evidence plus credible personal letters established a reasonable chance of being targeted for political opinion and ethnicity in Dire Dawa, and state protection or safe internal relocation was not available; therefore the RAD allowed the appeal and granted refugee protection.

Citation
TC0-08821
Parties
Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Associate Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Decision Reasons for Decision (appeal Allowed)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; RAD substitutes its own decision granting the appellants refugee protection.
Legal Topics
Credibility, Country Conditions, New Evidence on Appeal, Ethnicity, Political Opinion, State Protection, Internal Relocation
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Principal Appellant

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Associate Appellant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Decision Reasons for Decision (appeal Allowed)

  1. 1 Admissibility and weight of new evidence on appeal
  2. 2 Credibility of the Principal Appellant
  3. 3 Mischaracterization of appellants' ethnicity by the RPD

Ratio Decidendi

Despite credibility concerns, correcting the appellants' ethnicity to Amhara and considering admissible updated country condition evidence plus credible personal letters established a reasonable chance of being targeted for political opinion and ethnicity in Dire Dawa, and state protection or safe internal relocation was not available; therefore the RAD allowed the appeal and granted refugee protection.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; RAD substitutes its own decision granting the appellants refugee protection.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Appellants' claims for refugee protection granted