R. v. R. B. B.
Although the judge disbelieved the accused on certain points, significant doubts about the complainant's credibility arose from the long delay in reporting, lack of specificity and corroboration, conflicting post‑separation conduct, and a plausible motive to fabricate tied to matrimonial litigation; those doubts...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2000 BCSC 264
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Robin Bradley Brekkas
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal: Sexual Assault / Trial Judgment (acquittal)
- Outcome
- Acquitted (not guilty)
- Legal Topics
- Credibility, Reasonable Doubt, Delay in Reporting, Child Sexual Abuse, Corroboration, Motive to Fabricate
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Robin Bradley Brekkas
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal: Sexual Assault / Trial Judgment (acquittal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown proved the accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
- 2 Assessment of credibility of the complainant and the accused
- 3 Effect of delayed disclosure and potential motive to fabricate due to civil litigation
Ratio Decidendi
Although the judge disbelieved the accused on certain points, significant doubts about the complainant's credibility arose from the long delay in reporting, lack of specificity and corroboration, conflicting post‑separation conduct, and a plausible motive to fabricate tied to matrimonial litigation; those doubts left the Crown unable to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and required acquittal.
Court Disposition
Acquitted (not guilty)
Orders
- Accused Robin Brekkas found not guilty of the sexual assault charges
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment