MB4-00642
The RAD applied a reasonableness standard and concluded the RPD's decision identifying a material contradiction, evasive testimony on key points and an unexplained delay in claiming was defensible; therefore the Appellants failed to prove their claims on a balance of probabilities and the RPD decision is confirmed.
- Citation
- MB4-00642
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Accompanying Appellant (spouse): XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal / Decision on Appeal by Refugee Appeal Division (rad); Confirmation of RPD Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Internal Flight Alternative, Delay in Claiming, Standard of Review, Request for Hearing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX
Accompanying Appellant (spouse)
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / Decision on Appeal by Refugee Appeal Division (rad); Confirmation of RPD Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the RPD made unreasonable credibility findings
- 2 Whether the Appellants meet the definition of a Convention refugee (s.96 IRPA) or person in need of protection (s.97 IRPA)
- 3 Whether an oral hearing before the RAD is required
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD applied a reasonableness standard and concluded the RPD's decision identifying a material contradiction, evasive testimony on key points and an unexplained delay in claiming was defensible; therefore the Appellants failed to prove their claims on a balance of probabilities and the RPD decision is confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- The determination of the Refugee Protection Division is confirmed that Ms. XXXX XXXX and Mr. XXXX XXXX are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection
- Request for an oral hearing before the RAD is denied
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment