MA5-03078
The panel rejected the claim because the claimant was found not credible on central aspects of his story and failed to rebut the presumption of state protection; on that basis he was neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- MA5-03078
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent (state): Refugee Protection Officer; Decision Maker (panel Member): Hélène Panagakos
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim (refugee Protection Division, Irb) / Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Claim for refugee protection rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, State Protection, Convention Refugee Definition, Person in Need of Protection, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Refugee Protection Officer
Respondent (state)
Hélène Panagakos
Decision Maker (panel Member)
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (refugee Protection Division, Irb) / Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether the claimant is a person in need of protection
- 3 Credibility of the claimant's testimony and documentary evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The panel rejected the claim because the claimant was found not credible on central aspects of his story and failed to rebut the presumption of state protection; on that basis he was neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim for refugee protection rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.
Orders
- Claim for refugee protection is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment