MA5-05751
The panel found the claimant not credible due to material inconsistencies, omissions, implausibilities and failure to produce timely documentary evidence; because credibility was determinative and the claimant failed to prove a well‑founded fear of persecution, the claim was rejected and he does not meet the statutory definitions of Convention refugee or person in need of protection.
- Citation
- MA5-05751
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Well Founded Fear of Persecution, Convention Refugee Status, Person in Need of Protection, Forced Recruitment/extortion by Non State Actors, Documentary Evidence and Compliance, Timing of Departure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is credible
- 2 Whether the claimant has a well‑founded fear of persecution
- 3 Whether the claimant meets the statutory definitions of Convention refugee or person in need of protection
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found the claimant not credible due to material inconsistencies, omissions, implausibilities and failure to produce timely documentary evidence; because credibility was determinative and the claimant failed to prove a well‑founded fear of persecution, the claim was rejected and he does not meet the statutory definitions of Convention refugee or person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected
Orders
- Claimant found not to be a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection; protection claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment