MB7-06993

MB7-06993

The claim is rejected because the claimant failed to establish the existence of the pivotal political organization or his father's membership in it, produced significant omissions and contradictions in his account, and offered no corroborating evidence to demonstrate a risk of persecution on a Convention ground or individualized risk under section 97 IRPA; therefore the claim has no credible basis.

Citation
MB7-06993
Parties
Claimant / Asylum Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent / Minister: Minister of Immigration
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Decision (reasons and Decision)
Outcome
Refugee protection claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection; claim has no credible basis.
Legal Topics
Credibility Assessment, Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, State Protection, Persecution Risk, Identity Verification
Source Language
English
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Credibility Assessment Convention Refugee Person in Need of Protection State Protection Persecution Risk +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Claimant / Asylum Claimant

Minister of Immigration

Respondent / Minister

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Decision (reasons and Decision)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee under section 96 IRPA
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is a person in need of protection under section 97 IRPA
  3. 3 Whether the claim has a credible basis

Ratio Decidendi

The claim is rejected because the claimant failed to establish the existence of the pivotal political organization or his father's membership in it, produced significant omissions and contradictions in his account, and offered no corroborating evidence to demonstrate a risk of persecution on a Convention ground or individualized risk under section 97 IRPA; therefore the claim has no credible basis.

Court Disposition

Refugee protection claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection; claim has no credible basis.

Orders

  • Refugee protection claim rejected.