MA5-03170

MA5-03170

The claimant's testimony and documentary record contained material inconsistencies, omissions and implausibilities that destroyed his credibility and failed to establish he was a member of the alleged group in 2004 or that he faces a well‑founded fear of persecution; therefore the claim for refugee protection is rejected.

Citation
MA5-03170
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Panel: Sajjad Randhawa
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision After Hearing
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant found not to be a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
Legal Topics
Credibility Findings, Convention Refugee Status, Burden of Proof, Documentary Corroboration, Omissions in Personal Information Form
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Sajjad Randhawa

Panel

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee or person in need of protection
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was a member of the alleged social group in 2004
  3. 3 Whether the claimant's evidence is credible and corroborated

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's testimony and documentary record contained material inconsistencies, omissions and implausibilities that destroyed his credibility and failed to establish he was a member of the alleged group in 2004 or that he faces a well‑founded fear of persecution; therefore the claim for refugee protection is rejected.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant found not to be a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection

Orders

  • Refugee protection claim rejected