Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc.
Registered or deposited plans of survey are published by or under the direction or control of the Crown within the meaning of s.12 because the provincial statutory land registration regime vests property, custody and exclusive control over format, content, amendment and dissemination in the Crown (including publication via an authorized service provider), and these works are government works where vesting Crown copyright furthers public interests of authenticity, accuracy and dissemination; therefore copyright vests in the Crown and no infringement by Teranet occurred.
- Citation
- 2019 SCC 43
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent on Cross Appeal: Keatley Surveying Ltd.; Respondent/appellant on Cross Appeal: Teranet Inc.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class Action — Intellectual Property (copyright) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada — Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross‑appeal unnecessary/moot
- Legal Topics
- Crown Copyright, Copyright Act S.12, Publication, Direction or Control, Land Registry Records, Technological Neutrality, Public‑private Partnership
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keatley Surveying Ltd.
Appellant/respondent on Cross Appeal
Teranet Inc.
Respondent/appellant on Cross Appeal
Procedural Posture
Class Action — Intellectual Property (copyright) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada — Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether copyright in plans of survey vests in Crown pursuant to s.12 of the Copyright Act due to registration/deposit in provincial land registry
- 2 Whether plans were prepared or published by or under the direction or control of the Crown
- 3 Scope and proper interpretation of 'direction or control' in s.12
Ratio Decidendi
Registered or deposited plans of survey are published by or under the direction or control of the Crown within the meaning of s.12 because the provincial statutory land registration regime vests property, custody and exclusive control over format, content, amendment and dissemination in the Crown (including publication via an authorized service provider), and these works are government works where vesting Crown copyright furthers public interests of authenticity, accuracy and dissemination; therefore copyright vests in the Crown and no infringement by Teranet occurred.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross‑appeal unnecessary/moot
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Cross‑appeal dismissed as moot
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment