Northern Pipeline Agency v. Perehinec
Section 17 of the Federal Court Act does not apply because the claim is against the Agency, not the Crown; s.11 of the Northern Pipeline Act authorizes the Agency to employ and thereby to enter employment contracts in its own name and is by necessary implication suable on those contracts in provincial superior courts; consequently the appeal is dismissed and provincial jurisdiction is proper.
- Citation
- [1983] 2 SCR 513
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Northern Pipeline Agency; Respondent / Plaintiff: John Perehinec; Co Defendant: Harold S. Millican
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Action for Wrongful Dismissal / Civil Employment Contract Dispute / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Alberta Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Crown Immunity, Jurisdiction, Federal Vs Provincial Jurisdiction, Sue Government Agency, Federal Court Act S.17, Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Northern Pipeline Agency
Appellant / Defendant
John Perehinec
Respondent / Plaintiff
Harold S. Millican
Co Defendant
Procedural Posture
Action for Wrongful Dismissal / Civil Employment Contract Dispute / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Alberta Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a federal agency can enter into an employment contract in its own name and be sued in its own right
- 2 Whether s.17(2) of the Federal Court Act grants exclusive jurisdiction to the Federal Court because the claim arises out of a contract entered into by or on behalf of the Crown
- 3 Whether the Agency's status as an agent of the Crown makes this an action against the Crown
Ratio Decidendi
Section 17 of the Federal Court Act does not apply because the claim is against the Agency, not the Crown; s.11 of the Northern Pipeline Act authorizes the Agency to employ and thereby to enter employment contracts in its own name and is by necessary implication suable on those contracts in provincial superior courts; consequently the appeal is dismissed and provincial jurisdiction is proper.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment