Sparling v. Québec (Caisse de Dépôt et Placement du Québec)
The Crown agent (Caisse) is bound by the CBCA insider reporting provisions because by purchasing shares it implicitly accepted the statutory benefits that define share ownership and therefore must also accept the attendant statutory burdens under the benefit/burden exception to Crown immunity; s.16 does not shield the Crown from obligations inseparable from the rights it claimed.
- Citation
- [1988] 2 SCR 1015
- Parties
- Appellant (agent of the Crown in Right of Quebec): Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec; Respondent (director): Frederick H. Sparling; Intervener: Attorney General of Quebec; Intervener: Attorney General for Alberta
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Hearing on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Crown Immunity, Benefit/burden Exception, Insider Reporting Obligations, Interpretation Act, Shareholder Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec
Appellant (agent of the Crown in Right of Quebec)
Frederick H. Sparling
Respondent (director)
Attorney General of Quebec
Intervener
Attorney General for Alberta
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Hearing on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a provincial Crown agent that acquires shares is bound by federal insider reporting provisions despite s.16 of the Interpretation Act
- 2 Whether the benefit/burden exception to Crown immunity applies where the Crown acquires shares governed by federal corporate statute
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown agent (Caisse) is bound by the CBCA insider reporting provisions because by purchasing shares it implicitly accepted the statutory benefits that define share ownership and therefore must also accept the attendant statutory burdens under the benefit/burden exception to Crown immunity; s.16 does not shield the Crown from obligations inseparable from the rights it claimed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, having become a shareholder of Domtar Inc., is bound by the Canada Business Corporations Act provisions governing shareholders (including ss.121‑125) and is required to submit insider reports in the prescribed form
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment