Elliott v. Elliott
The court awarded primary custody to the mother because, on balance, the best interests of the children were served by permitting her to continue as primary caregiver and to relocate for stable employment: the mother presented a viable plan and sufficient financial resources and there was corroborative Agency concern about the female child's disclosures; the father could not present a viable housing or parenting plan in the immediate term and the allegations raised safety concerns, therefore custody variation in favour of the mother was necessary while preserving reasonable access for the father to the extent feasible.
- Citation
- 2012 NSSC 364
- Parties
- Applicant (mother): Paula Angela Elliott; Respondent (father): Robert Levi Elliott
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Vary (family Law Custody/mobility) / Hearing and Decision of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (family Division)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: primary custody awarded to the mother; father granted reasonable access as circumstances permit; mother directed to assist with transportation costs for access during school breaks; father may apply for specific directions after filing a detailed parenting plan.
- Legal Topics
- Custody Variation, Mobility, Access/contact, Best Interests of the Child, Agency Investigation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paula Angela Elliott
Applicant (mother)
Robert Levi Elliott
Respondent (father)
Procedural Posture
Application to Vary (family Law Custody/mobility) / Hearing and Decision of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (family Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial arrangement should be varied to permit the mother to relocate to Newfoundland and Labrador with the children
- 2 Whether the father should be denied or restricted access given the female child's allegations of inappropriate touching and corroboration by the Minister's investigators
- 3 Whether the mother's employment and financial capacity justify relocation in the children's best interests
Ratio Decidendi
The court awarded primary custody to the mother because, on balance, the best interests of the children were served by permitting her to continue as primary caregiver and to relocate for stable employment: the mother presented a viable plan and sufficient financial resources and there was corroborative Agency concern about the female child's disclosures; the father could not present a viable housing or parenting plan in the immediate term and the allegations raised safety concerns, therefore custody variation in favour of the mother was necessary while preserving reasonable access for the father to the extent feasible.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: primary custody awarded to the mother; father granted reasonable access as circumstances permit; mother directed to assist with transportation costs for access during school breaks; father may apply for specific directions after filing a detailed parenting plan.
Orders
- Mother awarded custody of both children
- Father granted reasonable access to both children as circumstances permit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment