R. v. Laroche

R. v. Laroche

Court found continuity of the hospital blood sample proven beyond a reasonable doubt, accepted the hospital Vitros 950 analysis as reliable (220 mg% converted) and rejected the higher RCMP result as plausibly explained by degradation and lack of refrigeration during prolonged storage; using established elimination rates the accused's BAC at time of driving exceeded the legal limit and impairment caused loss of control of the motorcycle; convicted on impaired driving causing bodily harm, dangerous driving causing bodily harm, and driving over legal limit.

Citation
2009 BCSC 1896
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Sylvain Marco Laroche
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial — Judgment Delivered
Outcome
Accused convicted
Legal Topics
Dangerous Driving Causing Bodily Harm, Impaired Driving Causing Bodily Harm, Driving Over Legal Blood Alcohol Limit, Chain of Custody/continuity of Evidence, Forensic Toxicology, Causation and Mens Rea
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Sylvain Marco Laroche

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial — Judgment Delivered

  1. 1 Whether continuity/identity of the hospital blood sample was proven
  2. 2 How to resolve discrepant alcohol analyses (hospital Vitros 950 vs RCMP gas chromatograph)
  3. 3 Whether Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that accused was impaired and that impairment caused loss of control

Ratio Decidendi

Court found continuity of the hospital blood sample proven beyond a reasonable doubt, accepted the hospital Vitros 950 analysis as reliable (220 mg% converted) and rejected the higher RCMP result as plausibly explained by degradation and lack of refrigeration during prolonged storage; using established elimination rates the accused's BAC at time of driving exceeded the legal limit and impairment caused loss of control of the motorcycle; convicted on impaired driving causing bodily harm, dangerous driving causing bodily harm, and driving over legal limit.

Court Disposition

Accused convicted

Orders

  • Guilty: Count 1 — impaired driving causing bodily harm
  • Guilty: Count 2 — dangerous driving causing bodily harm