Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 590 v. The Registered Owners and Mortgagees of Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 590
The Court of Appeal found that ss.22 and 23 of the Declaration are inconsistent: s.22 imposes on unit owners a duty to maintain exclusive use common elements but does not expressly impose repair after normal wear and tear, while s.23 imposes on the corporation a duty to maintain and repair common elements only 'after damage'; this gap creates an error or inconsistency under s.109(3). The appeal was allowed and the court ordered the Declaration be amended to make clear unit owners are responsible for maintaining and repairing exclusive use common elements, including repair after normal wear and tear, with precise wording to be agreed or determined by the court.
- Citation
- 2020 ONCA 471
- Parties
- Applicant (appellant): Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 590; Respondents (respondents): The Registered Owners and Mortgagees of Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 590
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Application Judge (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; paragraph two of the order below set aside; court ordered amendment of the Declaration to resolve inconsistency regarding maintenance and repair of exclusive use common elements
- Legal Topics
- Declaration Amendment Under S.109(3), Exclusive Use Common Elements, Maintenance and Repair Obligations, Interpretation of Condominium Declaration, Cost Allocation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 590
Applicant (appellant)
The Registered Owners and Mortgagees of Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 590
Respondents (respondents)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Application Judge (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ss.22 and 23 of the Declaration contain an error or inconsistency such that the court may order an amendment under s.109(3) of the Condominium Act
- 2 Whether responsibility for maintenance and repair of chimney flues (exclusive use common elements) rests with unit owners or the condominium corporation, including repair after normal wear and tear versus repair after damage
- 3 Appropriate remedial amendment to the Declaration to resolve inconsistency
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal found that ss.22 and 23 of the Declaration are inconsistent: s.22 imposes on unit owners a duty to maintain exclusive use common elements but does not expressly impose repair after normal wear and tear, while s.23 imposes on the corporation a duty to maintain and repair common elements only 'after damage'; this gap creates an error or inconsistency under s.109(3). The appeal was allowed and the court ordered the Declaration be amended to make clear unit owners are responsible for maintaining and repairing exclusive use common elements, including repair after normal wear and tear, with precise wording to be agreed or determined by the court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; paragraph two of the order below set aside; court ordered amendment of the Declaration to resolve inconsistency regarding maintenance and repair of exclusive use common elements
Orders
- Set aside paragraph two of the order of the application judge
- Order amending the Declaration to clarify that unit owners shall maintain and repair any part of the common elements of which they have exclusive use, including the obligation to repair after normal wear and tear, in wording to be agreed by the parties or as further ordered by the court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment