MacInnes v. MacInnes
Section 146 of the Ontario Insurance Act must be read as permitting the insured to create limited interests among members of the preferred class (including life estates and remainders within that class); the will's alteration of the beneficiary designations is valid to that extent, but the attempted remainder to persons outside the preferred class is void and severable; separately, the Employee's Acceptance was testamentary in character and invalid for want of proper attestation, so the employee's share of the profit‑sharing fund forms part of the estate.
- Citation
- [1935] SCR 200
- Parties
- Appellant (plaintiff, Wife, Designated Beneficiary): Annie MacInnes; Respondent (mother): Margaret MacInnes; Respondent (sister / Alternate Remainderman): Mamie Campbell; Respondent Representative: Official Guardian (for infants and unborn issue of Mamie Campbell); Respondent (executor/trustee): Executor of the Estate of J.C. MacInnes; Deceased (testator / Insured): James Carmen MacInnes (deceased)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1934
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario; Motion for Opinion and Direction in Estate Administration Below
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Designation of Beneficiary, Preferred Beneficiaries Under Insurance Act, Testamentary Character of Nomination Instruments, Employee Profit‑sharing Fund, Severability of Statutory Provisions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Annie MacInnes
Appellant (plaintiff, Wife, Designated Beneficiary)
Margaret MacInnes
Respondent (mother)
Mamie Campbell
Respondent (sister / Alternate Remainderman)
Official Guardian (for infants and unborn issue of Mamie Campbell)
Respondent Representative
Executor of the Estate of J.C. MacInnes
Respondent (executor/trustee)
James Carmen MacInnes (deceased)
Deceased (testator / Insured)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario; Motion for Opinion and Direction in Estate Administration Below
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a will can validly alter a preferred beneficiary designation under the Ontario Insurance Act and to what extent
- 2 Whether the gift over to a non‑preferred beneficiary (sister/issue) was competent
- 3 Whether the Employee's Acceptance nominating the wife was testamentary in character and hence invalid for want of required formalities
Ratio Decidendi
Section 146 of the Ontario Insurance Act must be read as permitting the insured to create limited interests among members of the preferred class (including life estates and remainders within that class); the will's alteration of the beneficiary designations is valid to that extent, but the attempted remainder to persons outside the preferred class is void and severable; separately, the Employee's Acceptance was testamentary in character and invalid for want of proper attestation, so the employee's share of the profit‑sharing fund forms part of the estate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Insurance proceeds to be paid to executor/trustee (Chartered Trust and Executor Company) and divided into two equal trust funds: one for the wife and one for the mother, each to receive net income with trustee discretion to encroach on corpus for support and maintenance
- On the death of either wife or mother the balance of her share to be added to the survivor's share and held for the survivor in the same manner; if the mother predeceases the widow the whole balance belongs to the widow absolutely; if the mother survives the widow then on the mother's death the whole balance reverts...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment