Westminer Canada Ltd. v. Amirault
The Court upheld the trial judge's factual findings that the Seabright directors acted honestly and in good faith and did not commit fraud; Westminer and related companies negligently failed to notify insurers and deliberately prosecuted the Ontario action with predominant purpose to injure the directors (civil...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 1994 NSCA 13
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: Westminer Canada Limited; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: Westminer Canada Holdings Limited; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: Western Mining Corporation Holdings Limited; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: James H. Lalor; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: Peter Maloney; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: Donald Snell; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: William B. Braithwaite; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal: Robert Couzin; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal: John A. Amirault; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal: H. Robert Hemming; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal: Colin J. MacDonald; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal: William S. McCartney; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal: Fred Hansen; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal: Terence D. Coughlan; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal: John A. Garnett
- Court
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Multi‑party Trial (directors Liability, Indemnity, Insurance, Torts) / Judgment on Appeal (court of Appeal Decision Affirming Trial Judge With Modifications on Costs and Interest)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed except for certain modifications ordered by Court of Appeal regarding inclusion of Nova Scotia costs in indemnity and pre‑judgment interest timing; cross-appeals largely dismissed; parties awarded damages, indemnity and costs as modified.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Duties and Indemnification, Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance, Civil Conspiracy, Negligent and Wilful Misrepresentation, Inducing Breach of Contract, Abuse of Process, Costs (solicitor and Client), Pre‑judgment Interest
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Westminer Canada Limited
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
Westminer Canada Holdings Limited
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
Western Mining Corporation Holdings Limited
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
James H. Lalor
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
Peter Maloney
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
Donald Snell
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
William B. Braithwaite
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
Robert Couzin
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal
John A. Amirault
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal
H. Robert Hemming
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal
Colin J. MacDonald
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal
William S. McCartney
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal
Fred Hansen
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal
Terence D. Coughlan
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal
John A. Garnett
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Multi‑party Trial (directors Liability, Indemnity, Insurance, Torts) / Judgment on Appeal (court of Appeal Decision Affirming Trial Judge With Modifications on Costs and Interest)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Seabright directors committed fraud or wilful misrepresentation
- 2 Whether D&O insurance coverage was lost and whether defendants had duty to give notice
- 3 Whether defendants breached indemnity by-law and entitlement to indemnity
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the trial judge's factual findings that the Seabright directors acted honestly and in good faith and did not commit fraud; Westminer and related companies negligently failed to notify insurers and deliberately prosecuted the Ontario action with predominant purpose to injure the directors (civil conspiracy), therefore respondents are entitled to indemnity for defence costs (including Nova Scotia costs), damages as assessed, solicitor‑client costs in rare and exceptional circumstances, and pre‑judgment interest on indemnity and certain awards; appellate review will not overturn trial credibility findings absent palpable error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed except for certain modifications ordered by Court of Appeal regarding inclusion of Nova Scotia costs in indemnity and pre‑judgment interest timing; cross-appeals largely dismissed; parties awarded damages, indemnity and costs as modified.
Orders
- Appeal, cross‑appeals and notices of contention dismissed except as to specified variations on costs and pre‑judgment interest
- Award general damages: Coughlan CAD 1,000,000; Garnett CAD 50,000; Amirault CAD 200,000; Hemming CAD 200,000; MacDonald CAD 200,000; McCartney CAD 200,000; Hansen CAD 200,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment