R. v. Boudreau
Defence failed to establish a basis to conclude that DFO memos/emails from the July 13, 2007 meeting exist and are potentially relevant; furthermore, based on undisputed information about the meeting the court found any such documentation would be clearly irrelevant to the prosecution of Mr. Boudreau; accordingly the disclosure application is denied.
- Citation
- 2009 NSPC 7
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Gordon Andreau Boudreau
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (fisheries Act Offences) / Pre Trial — Disclosure Application (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Disclosure application denied.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Crown Disclosure Obligations, Relevance, Third Party Records, Pre Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Gordon Andreau Boudreau
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal (fisheries Act Offences) / Pre Trial — Disclosure Application (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Crown must inquire into and disclose DFO memos/emails arising from July 13, 2007 meeting
- 2 Standard for defence to obtain disclosure when Crown denies or is unaware of existence of material
- 3 Test of relevance for disclosure (reasonable possibility of usefulness)
Ratio Decidendi
Defence failed to establish a basis to conclude that DFO memos/emails from the July 13, 2007 meeting exist and are potentially relevant; furthermore, based on undisputed information about the meeting the court found any such documentation would be clearly irrelevant to the prosecution of Mr. Boudreau; accordingly the disclosure application is denied.
Court Disposition
Disclosure application denied.
Orders
- Application for production of DFO memos, emails or other records relating to the July 13, 2007 meeting denied.
- No further disclosure required from the Crown in relation to the July 13, 2007 meeting.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment