City of Montreal v. City of Ste. Cunégonde / City of Ste. Cunégonde v. City of St. Henri / City of Ste. Cunégonde v. Town of Westmount
The guarantee in the written agreements bound the higher municipalities for damages resulting both from making the connections and from the subsequent use of the Montreal sewer; the guarantors were not excused by Montreal's delay in constructing additional works; the guarantor's obligation did not require a prior judicial condemnation of Montreal as a condition precedent; and damages were to be apportioned among the municipalities in proportion to the area drained into the Montreal sewer.
- Citation
- (1902) 32 SCR 135
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Appellant: City of Montreal; Defendant; Respondent; Plaintiff in Warranty; Appellant: City of Ste. Cunégonde de Montreal; Defendant in Warranty; Respondent: City of St. Henri; Defendant in Warranty; Respondent: Town of Westmount (Côte St-Antoine)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (contract Dispute Involving Municipal Guarantee) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Queen's Bench (appeal Side), Province of Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal of the City of Montreal allowed with costs; appeals of the City of Ste. Cunégonde partly allowed without costs; Superior Court judgment in favour of Montreal reinstated in respect of reimbursement; Ste. Cunégonde's warranty claims against St. Henri and Westmount maintained and apportioned.
- Legal Topics
- Drainage, Inter Municipal Works, Guarantee/indemnity, Continuing Liability, Contribution and Apportionment, Res Judicata
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City of Montreal
Plaintiff; Appellant
City of Ste. Cunégonde de Montreal
Defendant; Respondent; Plaintiff in Warranty; Appellant
City of St. Henri
Defendant in Warranty; Respondent
Town of Westmount (Côte St-Antoine)
Defendant in Warranty; Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (contract Dispute Involving Municipal Guarantee) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Queen's Bench (appeal Side), Province of Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the guarantee in the sewer connection agreements covered only the act of making the physical connection or also continuing liability for use of the Montreal sewer thereafter
- 2 Whether the guarantor's obligation was conditional upon a prior judicial determination (condemnation) against Montreal
- 3 Whether postponement by Montreal of constructing additional sewer works relieved the guarantors of liability
Ratio Decidendi
The guarantee in the written agreements bound the higher municipalities for damages resulting both from making the connections and from the subsequent use of the Montreal sewer; the guarantors were not excused by Montreal's delay in constructing additional works; the guarantor's obligation did not require a prior judicial condemnation of Montreal as a condition precedent; and damages were to be apportioned among the municipalities in proportion to the area drained into the Montreal sewer.
Court Disposition
Appeal of the City of Montreal allowed with costs; appeals of the City of Ste. Cunégonde partly allowed without costs; Superior Court judgment in favour of Montreal reinstated in respect of reimbursement; Ste. Cunégonde's warranty claims against St. Henri and Westmount maintained and apportioned.
Orders
- Reinstate Superior Court judgment ordering City of Ste. Cunégonde to reimburse City of Montreal $3,040.95 (capital, interest and costs)
- Ste. Cunégonde's warranty actions against City of St. Henri and Town of Westmount maintained and damages apportioned by drained area: Ste. Cunégonde (72 arpents) 1/6 = $506.83; St. Henri (147 arpents) 2/6 = $1,013.65; Westmount (222 arpents) 3/6 = $1,520.47, with interest from date of institution of the principal...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment