E.M.G. v. G.R.W.
Although the court found past domestic violence by Mr. W., the facts as of November 7, 2007 did not demonstrate the immediacy or risk required to make an emergency protection order forthwith; therefore the EPO was improperly issued and must be terminated.
- Citation
- 2007 NSSC 356
- Parties
- Respondent/applicant: E.M.G.; Applicant/respondent: G.R.W.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domestic Violence Intervention Act Application / S.12(1) Review Hearing of Emergency Protection Order
- Outcome
- Emergency Protection Order terminated
- Legal Topics
- Emergency Protection Order, Domestic Violence Intervention Act, Standard of Proof (balance of Probabilities), Custody Concerns
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E.M.G.
Respondent/applicant
G.R.W.
Applicant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Domestic Violence Intervention Act Application / S.12(1) Review Hearing of Emergency Protection Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether domestic violence had occurred
- 2 Whether an Emergency Protection Order should have been made forthwith under s.6(1) of the Domestic Violence Intervention Act
- 3 Whether facts at time of application showed immediate risk justifying emergency intervention
Ratio Decidendi
Although the court found past domestic violence by Mr. W., the facts as of November 7, 2007 did not demonstrate the immediacy or risk required to make an emergency protection order forthwith; therefore the EPO was improperly issued and must be terminated.
Court Disposition
Emergency Protection Order terminated
Orders
- Emergency Protection Order issued November 7, 2007 is terminated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment