Montreal Rolling Mills Co. v. Corcoran
Plaintiff failed to prove by direct evidence or by weighty, precise and consistent presumptions that the employer's fault caused the employee's death; therefore the claim for civil damages cannot be maintained; additionally the Quebec Factories Act is a police statute that does not, by its language, alter or create civil liability against the employer.
- Citation
- (1896) 26 SCR 595
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: The Montreal Rolling Mills Company; Plaintiff/respondent: Mary Ann Corcoran
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 1896
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Wrongful Death (master and Servant, Negligence) / On Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; action dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Employer Liability, Factories Act, Onus of Proof, Presumptions, Causation, Police Regulations Vs Civil Liability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Montreal Rolling Mills Company
Defendant/appellant
Mary Ann Corcoran
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Wrongful Death (master and Servant, Negligence) / On Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff proved causal link between employer's alleged fault and employee's death
- 2 Whether circumstantial evidence and presumptions were sufficient to establish employer negligence
- 3 Whether breach of the Quebec Factories Act gives rise to civil liability in favour of the employee or heirs
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to prove by direct evidence or by weighty, precise and consistent presumptions that the employer's fault caused the employee's death; therefore the claim for civil damages cannot be maintained; additionally the Quebec Factories Act is a police statute that does not, by its language, alter or create civil liability against the employer.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; action dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Action dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment