Corridor Transport Inc. v. Vittorio Junior Lentini

Corridor Transport Inc. v. Vittorio Junior Lentini

The trial judge reasonably found there was no meeting of the minds on essential terms (notably which Lentini was the contracting party and whether LTI receivables belonged to the partnership) and therefore no enforceable contract; absent an enforceable contract or possessory interest by CTI in the disputed receipts,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2024 ONCA 773
Parties
Appellant Plaintiff: Corridor Transport Inc.; Appellant Plaintiff: Corridor Transport Limited Partnership; Respondent Defendant: Vittorio Junior Lentini; Respondent Defendant: LTI Logistics Inc.; Respondent Defendant: Loblaw Companies Limited
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
23 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (contract and Tort) / Appeal to Court of Appeal From a 9 Day Trial Judgment of Superior Court (decision Below Dated Feb 14, 2023); Appeal Heard Feb 22, 2024; Judgment Oct 23, 2024
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Enforceability of Contract, Conversion (tort), Meeting of Minds, Identity of Contracting Party, Possessory Interest in Funds, Costs Award
Source Language
english
Contract Law Tort Law Partnership Law Corporate/director Duties Banking Law Enforceability of Contract Conversion (tort) Meeting of Minds +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Corridor Transport Inc.

Appellant Plaintiff

Corridor Transport Limited Partnership

Appellant Plaintiff

Vittorio Junior Lentini

Respondent Defendant

LTI Logistics Inc.

Respondent Defendant

Loblaw Companies Limited

Respondent Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (contract and Tort) / Appeal to Court of Appeal From a 9 Day Trial Judgment of Superior Court (decision Below Dated Feb 14, 2023); Appeal Heard Feb 22, 2024; Judgment Oct 23, 2024

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an enforceable contract/partnership existed between CTI and the Lentinis
  2. 2 Whether the respondents committed conversion by depositing LTI customer cheques into LTI's BMO account
  3. 3 Whether a director (Vic Jr.) breached fiduciary duties by handling funds

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge reasonably found there was no meeting of the minds on essential terms (notably which Lentini was the contracting party and whether LTI receivables belonged to the partnership) and therefore no enforceable contract; absent an enforceable contract or possessory interest by CTI in the disputed receipts, the deposit of funds into LTI's BMO account did not constitute conversion. The Court of Appeal found no palpable or overriding error and dismissed the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Costs of the appeal to respondents in the amount of $20,600 inclusive.