Stephen v. McNeill
Appeal dismissed because the court was satisfied on the facts that the fire resulted from Ferguson's unauthorized acts in the afternoon (ignition by blow torch), which constituted an intervening cause negating defendant's liability even if Rylands v. Fletcher were otherwise applicable.
- Citation
- [1929] SCR 537
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Stephen; Defendant/respondent: McNeill
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 February 1929
- Procedural Posture
- Tort — Negligence / Fire (rylands V. Fletcher Invoked) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for British Columbia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Escape of Fire, Rylands V. Fletcher, Unauthorized Act of Third Person, Causation, Findings of Fact
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen
Plaintiff/appellant
McNeill
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Tort — Negligence / Fire (rylands V. Fletcher Invoked) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for British Columbia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant was liable for fire damage originating from defendant's premises
- 2 Whether the doctrine in Rylands v. Fletcher applied
- 3 Whether the fire was caused by an unauthorized act of a third person (Ferguson)
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal dismissed because the court was satisfied on the facts that the fire resulted from Ferguson's unauthorized acts in the afternoon (ignition by blow torch), which constituted an intervening cause negating defendant's liability even if Rylands v. Fletcher were otherwise applicable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment