Boulton v. Boulton
The recital in the agreement did not estop the respondent; the husband had expressly refused to assign the chattels to the creditor and therefore could validly transfer them to his wife as part of the consideration for her conveyance of land; the bill of sale was bona fide and the respondent was entitled to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- (1898) 28 SCR 592
- Parties
- Defendants Appellants: Paul F. Boulton and Others; Plaintiff Respondent: Louisa L. Boulton
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 1898
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Estoppel, Fraudulent Conveyance, Bill of Sale, Vendor's Lien, Mortgage Indemnity, Interpleader
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul F. Boulton and Others
Defendants Appellants
Louisa L. Boulton
Plaintiff Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a recital in an agreement estops a non‑party and prevents a subsequent bona fide transfer to that non‑party
- 2 Whether the bill of sale from the husband to the wife was fraudulent as against the creditor
- 3 Whether the respondent was entitled to indemnity against mortgage liability and a vendor's lien
Ratio Decidendi
The recital in the agreement did not estop the respondent; the husband had expressly refused to assign the chattels to the creditor and therefore could validly transfer them to his wife as part of the consideration for her conveyance of land; the bill of sale was bona fide and the respondent was entitled to the goods and to indemnity with a vendor's lien.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Respondent entitled to possession of the goods and to indemnity against the mortgage; vendor's lien granted on the land to secure the indemnity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment