Keddy v. Pine Glen Investments

Keddy v. Pine Glen Investments

The landlord had statutory rights to enter for reasonable inspections with proper notice; the tenant obstructed access necessary to address a persistent pharaoh ant infestation and thus breached statutory conditions (good behaviour and tenant obligations); the Director’s termination order was therefore appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
2024 NSSM 51
Parties
Appellant/tenant: Sara Keddy; Respondent/landlord: Ross McKeil operating as Pine Glen Investments
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
25 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancies Appeal / Appeal Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; Director of Residential Tenancies Order dated June 11, 2024 upheld; tenancy termination affirmed (vacant possession required effective July 6, 2024).
Legal Topics
Eviction/termination of Tenancy, Entry and Inspection, Good Behaviour Obligations, Pest Infestation Control, Notice of Entry Requirements
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sara Keddy

Appellant/tenant

Ross McKeil operating as Pine Glen Investments

Respondent/landlord

Procedural Posture

Residential Tenancies Appeal / Appeal Hearing and Decision

  1. 1 Whether the landlord validly terminated the tenancy for breach of statutory conditions under the Residential Tenancies Act
  2. 2 Whether the landlord provided proper written notice of entry for inspections as required by statute
  3. 3 Whether the tenant obstructed reasonable inspections necessary to address a pest infestation

Ratio Decidendi

The landlord had statutory rights to enter for reasonable inspections with proper notice; the tenant obstructed access necessary to address a persistent pharaoh ant infestation and thus breached statutory conditions (good behaviour and tenant obligations); the Director’s termination order was therefore appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; Director of Residential Tenancies Order dated June 11, 2024 upheld; tenancy termination affirmed (vacant possession required effective July 6, 2024).

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed and Director's Order dated June 11, 2024 is upheld.
  • Tenant's request for additional time to vacate is denied; tenant must vacate in accordance with the Director's Order effective July 6, 2024.