Keddy v. Pine Glen Investments
The landlord had statutory rights to enter for reasonable inspections with proper notice; the tenant obstructed access necessary to address a persistent pharaoh ant infestation and thus breached statutory conditions (good behaviour and tenant obligations); the Director’s termination order was therefore appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- 2024 NSSM 51
- Parties
- Appellant/tenant: Sara Keddy; Respondent/landlord: Ross McKeil operating as Pine Glen Investments
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancies Appeal / Appeal Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Director of Residential Tenancies Order dated June 11, 2024 upheld; tenancy termination affirmed (vacant possession required effective July 6, 2024).
- Legal Topics
- Eviction/termination of Tenancy, Entry and Inspection, Good Behaviour Obligations, Pest Infestation Control, Notice of Entry Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sara Keddy
Appellant/tenant
Ross McKeil operating as Pine Glen Investments
Respondent/landlord
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancies Appeal / Appeal Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord validly terminated the tenancy for breach of statutory conditions under the Residential Tenancies Act
- 2 Whether the landlord provided proper written notice of entry for inspections as required by statute
- 3 Whether the tenant obstructed reasonable inspections necessary to address a pest infestation
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord had statutory rights to enter for reasonable inspections with proper notice; the tenant obstructed access necessary to address a persistent pharaoh ant infestation and thus breached statutory conditions (good behaviour and tenant obligations); the Director’s termination order was therefore appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Director of Residential Tenancies Order dated June 11, 2024 upheld; tenancy termination affirmed (vacant possession required effective July 6, 2024).
Orders
- Appeal dismissed and Director's Order dated June 11, 2024 is upheld.
- Tenant's request for additional time to vacate is denied; tenant must vacate in accordance with the Director's Order effective July 6, 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment