TA6-14717
Panel found insufficient credible or trustworthy evidence to exclude claimant under Article 1F(a) and, on negative credibility findings, determined the alleged incidents did not probably occur; therefore claimant is not a Convention refugee nor at risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment and the claim was rejected.
- Citation
- TA6-14717
- Parties
- Claimant/asylum Seeker: XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent/minister: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (representative)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim; Exclusion Assessment Under Article 1 F(a) / Hearing and Determination; Reasons and Decision (final)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant not excluded under Article 1F(a) but not found to be a Convention refugee nor in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Exclusion (article 1 F(a)), Credibility, Persecution, Torture, Arrest and Detention, Political Opinion, Ethnicity (kurdish), Religion (alevi), Gender Related Persecution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant/asylum Seeker
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (representative)
Respondent/minister
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim; Exclusion Assessment Under Article 1 F(a) / Hearing and Determination; Reasons and Decision (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant should be excluded from refugee protection under Article 1F(a) for alleged association with terrorist organizations
- 2 Credibility of the claimant's testimony and documentary evidence
- 3 Subjective and objective components of a well-founded fear of persecution
Ratio Decidendi
Panel found insufficient credible or trustworthy evidence to exclude claimant under Article 1F(a) and, on negative credibility findings, determined the alleged incidents did not probably occur; therefore claimant is not a Convention refugee nor at risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment and the claim was rejected.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant not excluded under Article 1F(a) but not found to be a Convention refugee nor in need of protection
Orders
- Claim rejected
- No exclusion finding under Article 1F(a) due to insufficient evidence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment