MA2-02646
The panel excluded the claimant because documentary evidence established that the Peruvian National Police committed crimes against humanity during the claimant's period of service, and applying the Ramirez criteria the claimant's long voluntary service, rank, variety of positions, implausible account minimizing his role and inability to credibly deny knowledge provide serious reasons for considering he was complicit in those crimes, making him excludable under Articles 1F(a) and 1F(c).
- Citation
- MA2-02646
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; Minister's Counsel: R. Godoy; Refugee Protection Officer: Lainie Wieskopf; Panel: Joulekhan Pirbay
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection / Decision (exclusion)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant excluded from refugee protection
- Legal Topics
- Exclusion Under Article 1 F, Crimes Against Humanity, Credibility Assessment, Particular Social Group (family), Protection Needs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
R. Godoy
Minister's Counsel
Lainie Wieskopf
Refugee Protection Officer
Joulekhan Pirbay
Panel
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection / Decision (exclusion)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is credible
- 2 Whether there are serious reasons for considering the claimant complicit in crimes against humanity such that exclusion under Article 1F(a) and 1F(c) applies
- 3 Whether the claimant is a person in need of protection
Ratio Decidendi
The panel excluded the claimant because documentary evidence established that the Peruvian National Police committed crimes against humanity during the claimant's period of service, and applying the Ramirez criteria the claimant's long voluntary service, rank, variety of positions, implausible account minimizing his role and inability to credibly deny knowledge provide serious reasons for considering he was complicit in those crimes, making him excludable under Articles 1F(a) and 1F(c).
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant excluded from refugee protection
Orders
- Claim for refugee protection rejected
- Claimant excluded under Articles 1F(a) and 1F(c) of the 1951 Convention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment