James Bay Ry. Co. v. Armstrong
When a statute permits an appeal to a 'superior court' and in the province more than one superior court is designated, an appeal taken to the High Court (the curia designata) is final for the purposes of that statutory appeal; therefore no further appeal lies to the Supreme Court of Canada and the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal or grant special leave.
- Citation
- (1907) 38 SCR 511
- Parties
- Appellant; Defendant: James Bay Railway Company; Respondent; Plaintiff: Samuel W. Armstrong
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 April 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From Judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Justice for Ontario Increasing Arbitrators' Award
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction; motion for leave dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Expropriation, Railway Act Appeals, Curia Designata, Superior Court Definition, Jurisdiction to Hear Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Bay Railway Company
Appellant; Defendant
Samuel W. Armstrong
Respondent; Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From Judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Justice for Ontario Increasing Arbitrators' Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal lies to the Supreme Court of Canada from a High Court judgment under sec.168 of 3 Edw. VII ch.58 (Railway Act amendment)
- 2 Whether election of the High Court as the designated superior court (curia designata) for appeal precludes further appeal to a higher court
- 3 Interpretation of 'Superior Court' in the Interpretation Act and its effect on appeal routes
Ratio Decidendi
When a statute permits an appeal to a 'superior court' and in the province more than one superior court is designated, an appeal taken to the High Court (the curia designata) is final for the purposes of that statutory appeal; therefore no further appeal lies to the Supreme Court of Canada and the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal or grant special leave.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction; motion for leave dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed without costs
- Cross-appeal dismissed without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment