R. v. Martin
The identification evidence was inherently frail and unreliable: officers' recognitions were unsupported by distinguishing features, the security videotape and stills were of poor quality, formal identification procedures were not used and the only eyewitness did not view the exhibits; consequently the Crown failed to prove the accused's identity as the robber beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused must be acquitted.
- Citation
- 2005 NSPC 32
- Parties
- Prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Dean Victor Martin
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Robbery / Trial Decision (acquittal)
- Outcome
- Acquitted on all counts
- Legal Topics
- Eyewitness Identification, Videotape Evidence, Police Identification Procedures, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Prosecution
Dean Victor Martin
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Robbery / Trial Decision (acquittal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Reliability of identification evidence
- 2 Admissibility and probative value of security videotape and still photographs
- 3 Use and omission of formal identification protocols (photographic/physical lineups)
Ratio Decidendi
The identification evidence was inherently frail and unreliable: officers' recognitions were unsupported by distinguishing features, the security videotape and stills were of poor quality, formal identification procedures were not used and the only eyewitness did not view the exhibits; consequently the Crown failed to prove the accused's identity as the robber beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused must be acquitted.
Court Disposition
Acquitted on all counts
Orders
- Acquittal entered on the record
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment