Berkley Oil and Gas Ltd. v. Alminex Ltd. et al.

Berkley Oil and Gas Ltd. v. Alminex Ltd. et al.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the trial judge correctly construed the farmout agreement's royalty clause to reserve an overriding royalty to the lessor as determined, and the appellate courts properly affirmed that construction.

Citation
[1975] 1 SCR 262
Parties
Defendant Appellant: Berkley Oil and Gas Ltd.; Plaintiff Respondent: Alminex Limited; Plaintiff Respondent: Home Oil Company Limited; Plaintiff Respondent: Kern County Land Company
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
2 October 1973
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (mines and Minerals) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Farmout Agreement, Overriding Royalty, Interpretation of Royalty Clause
Source Language
English
Mines and Minerals Contract Law Property Law Oil and Gas Farmout Agreement Overriding Royalty Interpretation of Royalty Clause

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Berkley Oil and Gas Ltd.

Defendant Appellant

Alminex Limited

Plaintiff Respondent

Home Oil Company Limited

Plaintiff Respondent

Kern County Land Company

Plaintiff Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (mines and Minerals) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Interpretation of an overriding royalty clause in a farmout agreement
  2. 2 Whether the royalty reserved to the lessor was affected by the farmout transaction
  3. 3 Proper construction of contractual royalty language

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the trial judge correctly construed the farmout agreement's royalty clause to reserve an overriding royalty to the lessor as determined, and the appellate courts properly affirmed that construction.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.