HMTQ v. Wilder et al
Given the accused's role as the kingpin, the sophistication and magnitude of the SRTC frauds (approximately $36M), the need for general deterrence and uniformity with co-accused, and absence of mitigating factors, a global custodial sentence of nine years and restitution of $5,000,000 (limited because of divestment of assets and multiple perpetrators) is appropriate; individual count sentences structured as concurrent for related counts and consecutive across projects, with possession count concurrent.
- Citation
- 2004 BCSC 644
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Co Accused: Roger E. Lawrence; Co Accused: Michael L. Vaz; Co Accused: Michael B. Richards; Co Accused: Victor J. Attrill; Co Accused: Ronald L. Johnson; Accused: Dara M. Wilder; Co Accused: Gerald M. Byerlay; Related Party (family Witness): Seona J. Wilder; Corporate Co Accused: Mid-Pacific Services Inc.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal: Fraud and Possession of Proceeds of Crime (income Tax Related) / Sentencing (re Trial)
- Outcome
- Accused found guilty; global sentence of nine years imprisonment imposed; restitution ordered in the amount of $5,000,000 to the Receiver General of Canada; specified counts to run concurrent and consecutive as set.
- Legal Topics
- Fraud, Possession of Property Obtained by Crime, Scientific Research Tax Credit, Income Tax Act, Sentencing Disparity, Ability to Pay Restitution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Roger E. Lawrence
Co Accused
Michael L. Vaz
Co Accused
Michael B. Richards
Co Accused
Victor J. Attrill
Co Accused
Ronald L. Johnson
Co Accused
Dara M. Wilder
Accused
Gerald M. Byerlay
Co Accused
Seona J. Wilder
Related Party (family Witness)
Mid-Pacific Services Inc.
Corporate Co Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal: Fraud and Possession of Proceeds of Crime (income Tax Related) / Sentencing (re Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate custodial sentence for large-scale SRTC tax fraud
- 2 Whether and how much restitution should be ordered against a divested accused
- 3 Whether parity/ disparity with co-accused requires adjustment of sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Given the accused's role as the kingpin, the sophistication and magnitude of the SRTC frauds (approximately $36M), the need for general deterrence and uniformity with co-accused, and absence of mitigating factors, a global custodial sentence of nine years and restitution of $5,000,000 (limited because of divestment of assets and multiple perpetrators) is appropriate; individual count sentences structured as concurrent for related counts and consecutive across projects, with possession count concurrent.
Court Disposition
Accused found guilty; global sentence of nine years imprisonment imposed; restitution ordered in the amount of $5,000,000 to the Receiver General of Canada; specified counts to run concurrent and consecutive as set.
Orders
- Counts 1 and 2 (Biomass Project): 3 years imprisonment on each count; Count 2 concurrent with Count 1
- Counts 3, 4 and 5 (Fly Ash Project): 3 years imprisonment on each count; the three counts concurrent with each other but consecutive to Counts 1 and 2
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment