R. v. Dunkers

R. v. Dunkers

The appropriate sentence is five years' imprisonment plus a restitution order of $204,197.80 because the gravity and degree of culpability were high given the large number of victims, devastating community impact, breach of trust by the bookkeeper and concealment of records; the purported late 'agreement' on a four‑year sentence did not bind the court and was outweighed by aggravating factors necessitating a greater sentence to meet denunciation, deterrence and reparation objectives.

Citation
2014 BCSC 1316
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Anita Marianne Dunkers
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Fraud / Sentencing (post‑conviction)
Outcome
Accused found guilty; sentenced to five years' imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution.
Legal Topics
Fraud by Bookkeeper, Breach of Trust, Victim Impact, Joint Submission on Sentence
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Fraud Sentencing Restitution Fraud by Bookkeeper Breach of Trust Victim Impact Joint Submission on Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Anita Marianne Dunkers

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Fraud / Sentencing (post‑conviction)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lawyers' agreement constituted a binding joint submission on sentence
  2. 2 Appropriate length of custodial sentence for defrauding a non‑profit of $204,197.80
  3. 3 Whether and in what amount restitution should be ordered under s.380.3

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate sentence is five years' imprisonment plus a restitution order of $204,197.80 because the gravity and degree of culpability were high given the large number of victims, devastating community impact, breach of trust by the bookkeeper and concealment of records; the purported late 'agreement' on a four‑year sentence did not bind the court and was outweighed by aggravating factors necessitating a greater sentence to meet denunciation, deterrence and reparation objectives.

Court Disposition

Accused found guilty; sentenced to five years' imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution.

Orders

  • Custodial sentence: 5 years imprisonment (federal penitentiary)
  • Restitution order: $204,197.80 payable to Capital Families Association