Liquor Control Board of Ontario v. Magnotta Winery Corporation
The Court held that the second branch of s.19 of FIPPA covers records prepared for use in litigation broadly construed to include mediation and settlement discussions; because the disputed records were prepared for and exchanged in mediation and were expressly confidential, they fall within s.19 and are exempt from disclosure, so the IPC's order to disclose was overturned.
- Citation
- 2010 ONCA 681
- Parties
- Applicant (respondent in Appeal): Liquor Control Board of Ontario; Respondents (respondents in Appeal): Magnotta Winery Corporation; Magnotta Winery Ltd.; Magnotta Wines Ltd.; Magnotta Winery Estates Limited; Magnotta Cellars Corporation; Magnotta Vineyards Ltd.; Magnotta Brewery Ltd.; Magnotta Distillery Ltd.; Magnotta Vintners Ltd.; Respondent (appellant): Information and Privacy Commissioner; Intervenor (respondent in Appeal): The Attorney General for Ontario
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (judicial Review of IPC Order) / Court of Appeal Hearing on Appeal From Divisional Court (judicial Review)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Divisional Court decision restored; disputed mediation and settlement records exempt from disclosure under s.19 FIPPA; no costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act S.19, Settlement Privilege, Litigation Privilege, Mediation Confidentiality, Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Liquor Control Board of Ontario
Applicant (respondent in Appeal)
Magnotta Winery Corporation; Magnotta Winery Ltd.; Magnotta Wines Ltd.; Magnotta Winery Estates Limited; Magnotta Cellars Corporation; Magnotta Vineyards Ltd.; Magnotta Brewery Ltd.; Magnotta Distillery Ltd.; Magnotta Vintners Ltd.
Respondents (respondents in Appeal)
Information and Privacy Commissioner
Respondent (appellant)
The Attorney General for Ontario
Intervenor (respondent in Appeal)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (judicial Review of IPC Order) / Court of Appeal Hearing on Appeal From Divisional Court (judicial Review)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether records prepared for mediation and settlement fall within the second branch of s.19 of FIPPA (records prepared by or for Crown counsel for use in giving legal advice or in contemplation of or for use in litigation)
- 2 Whether common law settlement privilege applies to exempt the disputed mediation and settlement records from disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the second branch of s.19 of FIPPA covers records prepared for use in litigation broadly construed to include mediation and settlement discussions; because the disputed records were prepared for and exchanged in mediation and were expressly confidential, they fall within s.19 and are exempt from disclosure, so the IPC's order to disclose was overturned.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Divisional Court decision restored; disputed mediation and settlement records exempt from disclosure under s.19 FIPPA; no costs ordered.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Divisional Court decision restoring LCBO's decision to withhold the Disputed Records reinstated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment