British Columbia Teachers’ Federation v. British Columbia Public School Employers’ Association
Munroe is binding and factually indistinguishable; there was no evidence or reasonable inference of harm from teachers' posting or wearing of political materials, so the district's absolute prohibition did not minimally impair s.2(b) rights and could not be justified under s.1; appeal allowed and arbitrator's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2013 BCCA 241
- Parties
- Appellant (union): British Columbia Teachers' Federation / Cranbrook District Teachers' Association; Respondent (employer): British Columbia Public School Employers' Association / The Board of Education of School District No. 5 (Southeast Kootenay)
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Charter Challenge in Labour Arbitration Appeal / On Appeal From Arbitration Award Under Labour Relations Code; Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; arbitrator's award set aside; BCTF grievance allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Section 1 Oakes Test, Teachers' Political Expression in Schools, Prescribed by Law, Minimal Impairment and Proportionality
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
British Columbia Teachers' Federation / Cranbrook District Teachers' Association
Appellant (union)
British Columbia Public School Employers' Association / The Board of Education of School District No. 5 (Southeast Kootenay)
Respondent (employer)
Procedural Posture
Charter Challenge in Labour Arbitration Appeal / On Appeal From Arbitration Award Under Labour Relations Code; Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether teachers' political expression in schools is protected by s.2(b) of the Charter
- 2 Whether the district directive prohibiting political posters/buttons is a reasonable limit under s.1
- 3 Whether the decision in Munroe is binding or distinguishable on the facts
Ratio Decidendi
Munroe is binding and factually indistinguishable; there was no evidence or reasonable inference of harm from teachers' posting or wearing of political materials, so the district's absolute prohibition did not minimally impair s.2(b) rights and could not be justified under s.1; appeal allowed and arbitrator's decision set aside, grievance allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; arbitrator's award set aside; BCTF grievance allowed.
Orders
- Set aside the arbitrator's October 30, 2011 award.
- Allow the grievance of the British Columbia Teachers' Federation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment