Grossman v. Barrett
Purchaser is in good faith under art.1489 C.C. if he honestly believes the vendor is owner; the respondents purchased the car in good faith from a trader dealing in similar articles (Robinson Motor Car Co.), therefore appellant cannot revendicate the stolen car without first reimbursing the purchase price paid by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1926] SCR 129
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: L. O. Grossman; Respondent/defendant: L. E. Barrett; Respondent/defendant: Prudential Coal Company, Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 1925
- Procedural Posture
- Revendication (action to Recover Stolen Property) / Appeal — Judgment of Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From Court of King’s Bench, Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; dismissal without prejudice to appellant's right to revendicate upon reimbursing the price paid by respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Good Faith Purchaser, Stolen Goods, Revindication, Article 1489 C.c.
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L. O. Grossman
Appellant/plaintiff
L. E. Barrett
Respondent/defendant
Prudential Coal Company, Ltd.
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Revendication (action to Recover Stolen Property) / Appeal — Judgment of Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From Court of King’s Bench, Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether purchaser was a 'buyer in good faith' under art.1489 C.C.
- 2 Whether the vendor (Robinson Motor Car Co.) qualified as a trader dealing in similar articles
- 3 Whether owner could revendicate the stolen car without reimbursing purchaser under art.1489 and art.2268 C.C.
Ratio Decidendi
Purchaser is in good faith under art.1489 C.C. if he honestly believes the vendor is owner; the respondents purchased the car in good faith from a trader dealing in similar articles (Robinson Motor Car Co.), therefore appellant cannot revendicate the stolen car without first reimbursing the purchase price paid by respondents; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; dismissal without prejudice to appellant's right to revendicate upon reimbursing the price paid by respondents.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Dismissal without prejudice to appellant's right to revendicate the car on reimbursing the price paid by the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment