R. v. Patterson
On the accepted evidence and admissions the accused, as sole director/owner and directing mind of 3007299, knowingly participated in and facilitated a scheme of fictitious transactions, wilfully caused the company not to file GST/HST returns to enable fraudulent input tax credit/refund claims, thereby satisfying s.327(1)(c); counts two and three are duplicious with count one and are conditionally stayed under the Kienapple rule.
- Citation
- 2002 NSPC 14
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen (R); Accused: Mark Ramsay Patterson; Named Company: 3007299 Nova Scotia Limited; Third Party Company: 3006970 Nova Scotia Limited; Third Party Company: 3008894 Nova Scotia Limited; Named Associate/co Conspirator: Darren Throop; Named Associate/co Conspirator: Dale Guiney; Associate/beneficiary: Robert Arena / Yukon Auto Sales
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Tax (excise Tax Act) / Trial Decision (oral Decision; Conviction Entered on Count One; Conditional Stays on Counts Two and Three)
- Outcome
- Conviction entered on count one (wilfully caused company to evade compliance/payment of tax); conditional stays entered on counts two and three pursuant to Kienapple.
- Legal Topics
- Goods and Services Tax/harmonized Sales Tax, Excise Tax Act S.327, Conspiracy, Tax Evasion, Corporate Attribution/directing Mind, Mens Rea, Kienapple Rule
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen (R)
Crown
Mark Ramsay Patterson
Accused
3007299 Nova Scotia Limited
Named Company
3006970 Nova Scotia Limited
Third Party Company
3008894 Nova Scotia Limited
Third Party Company
Darren Throop
Named Associate/co Conspirator
Dale Guiney
Named Associate/co Conspirator
Robert Arena / Yukon Auto Sales
Associate/beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Criminal Tax (excise Tax Act) / Trial Decision (oral Decision; Conviction Entered on Count One; Conditional Stays on Counts Two and Three)
Legal Issues
- 1 Was 3007299 Nova Scotia Limited required to file GST/HST returns for the periods in issue?
- 2 Why did 3007299 Nova Scotia Limited fail to file GST/HST returns for the periods in issue?
- 3 What was the role and mens rea of Mark Ramsay Patterson in the omissions and commissions of 3007299 Nova Scotia Limited?
Ratio Decidendi
On the accepted evidence and admissions the accused, as sole director/owner and directing mind of 3007299, knowingly participated in and facilitated a scheme of fictitious transactions, wilfully caused the company not to file GST/HST returns to enable fraudulent input tax credit/refund claims, thereby satisfying s.327(1)(c); counts two and three are duplicious with count one and are conditionally stayed under the Kienapple rule.
Court Disposition
Conviction entered on count one (wilfully caused company to evade compliance/payment of tax); conditional stays entered on counts two and three pursuant to Kienapple.
Orders
- Conviction entered on Count 1 (s.327(1)(c) Excise Tax Act)
- Conditional stays entered on Counts 2 and 3 (Kienapple rule)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment