CA3-01301
Applying the Federal Court of Appeal decisions, Guideline 7 and the IRB-first standard order of questioning do not breach natural justice, do not unlawfully fetter RPD members' discretion and do not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias; no claimant-specific unfairness was established, so there was no failure to observe a principle of natural justice and the reopening applications must be dismissed.
- Citation
- CA3-01301
- Parties
- Claimant: CA3-01301; CA4-00110; CA4-00513; CA4-00504; CA5-00229; CA5-00046; Refugee Protection Officer: Refugee Protection Division; Minister's Counsel: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Reopen Refugee Protection Claim / Decision on Application to Reopen
- Outcome
- Applications to reopen dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Guideline 7, Order of Questioning, Natural Justice, Fettering of Discretion, Reasonable Apprehension of Bias, Reopening
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CA3-01301; CA4-00110; CA4-00513; CA4-00504; CA5-00229; CA5-00046
Claimant
Refugee Protection Division
Refugee Protection Officer
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Minister's Counsel
Procedural Posture
Application to Reopen Refugee Protection Claim / Decision on Application to Reopen
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Chairperson's Guideline 7 and the IRB-first standard order of questioning breach the duty of fairness/natural justice
- 2 Whether the standard order of questioning unlawfully fetters RPD members' discretion
- 3 Whether the application of Guideline 7 gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the Federal Court of Appeal decisions, Guideline 7 and the IRB-first standard order of questioning do not breach natural justice, do not unlawfully fetter RPD members' discretion and do not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias; no claimant-specific unfairness was established, so there was no failure to observe a principle of natural justice and the reopening applications must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Applications to reopen dismissed
Orders
- Applications to reopen the refugee protection claims dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment