City of Toronto v. Consumers' Gas Company of Toronto
The Public Service Works on Highways Act governs compensation where municipal operations are properly characterized as constructing, reconstructing, changing, altering or improving a highway; in such cases the gas company is limited to recovery of one-half of the labour cost only (materials and other losses excluded); construction of the sewers in this case was not, as a matter of fact, an improvement to particular highways within s.2 so relocations occasioned thereby were payable in full, and relocations required by Board of Railway Commissioners' subway construction were not recoverable from the city.
- Citation
- [1941] SCR 584
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Corporation of the City of Toronto; Plaintiff/respondent: The Consumers' Gas Company of Toronto
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 October 1941
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed with costs (majority); Kerwin J. dissenting in part.
- Legal Topics
- Highways, Drainage, Relocation of Utilities, Compensation Under Public Service Works on Highways Act
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corporation of the City of Toronto
Defendant/appellant
The Consumers' Gas Company of Toronto
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'highway' in the Act includes city streets
- 2 Whether The Public Service Works on Highways Act governs compensation for relocations caused by municipal works
- 3 Whether construction of sanitary or storm (surface drainage) sewers constitutes 'constructing, reconstructing, changing, altering or improving any highway' under s.2
Ratio Decidendi
The Public Service Works on Highways Act governs compensation where municipal operations are properly characterized as constructing, reconstructing, changing, altering or improving a highway; in such cases the gas company is limited to recovery of one-half of the labour cost only (materials and other losses excluded); construction of the sewers in this case was not, as a matter of fact, an improvement to particular highways within s.2 so relocations occasioned thereby were payable in full, and relocations required by Board of Railway Commissioners' subway construction were not recoverable from the city.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed with costs (majority); Kerwin J. dissenting in part.
Orders
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment