HMTQ v Nelson

HMTQ v Nelson

Given the conflicting testimony on who was driving, the credibility issues identified (including inconsistent statements, alleged intimidation, and witness intoxication), and applying the W(D) test, there remained a reasonable doubt as to whether Nelson was the driver; accordingly the indictment was dismissed and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2000 BCSC 1579
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Dwain David Nelson
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 October 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Motor Vehicle Offences / Trial; Reasons for Judgment (acquittal)
Outcome
Accused acquitted; indictment dismissed on all counts.
Legal Topics
Identification of Accused, Dangerous Driving Causing Bodily Harm, Impaired Driving, Burden of Proof, Witness Credibility, Hearsay Admissibility, W(d) Direction
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Evidence Road Traffic Law Identification of Accused Dangerous Driving Causing Bodily Harm Impaired Driving Burden of Proof Witness Credibility +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown

Dwain David Nelson

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Motor Vehicle Offences / Trial; Reasons for Judgment (acquittal)

  1. 1 Who was driving the truck at the time of the accident (identification)
  2. 2 Whether the Crown proved the accused's identity as driver beyond a reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether the W(D) test requires acquittal given conflicting evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Given the conflicting testimony on who was driving, the credibility issues identified (including inconsistent statements, alleged intimidation, and witness intoxication), and applying the W(D) test, there remained a reasonable doubt as to whether Nelson was the driver; accordingly the indictment was dismissed and the accused acquitted on all counts.

Court Disposition

Accused acquitted; indictment dismissed on all counts.

Orders

  • Indictment dismissed on all counts; accused acquitted