R. v. R.M.D.
Given the sequential, grooming-based sexual abuse of two minors by a person in a position of trust, and the need for denunciation and deterrence under s.718.01 plus aggravating factors under s.718.02, appropriate global punishment is nine years' imprisonment composed of concurrent sentences within each victim grouping and consecutive application between groups, with conditional stays entered on overlapping counts under the Kienapple principle and ancillary orders for DNA, lifetime registration and a 10-year firearms prohibition.
- Citation
- 2012 BCSC 1889
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: R.M.D.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted by jury; sentenced to nine years' imprisonment; conditional stays entered on specified counts; ancillary orders imposed
- Legal Topics
- Incest, Sexual Assault, Invitation to Sexual Touching, Abuse of Trust, Grooming, Kienapple Principle, Totality Principle, Ancillary Orders (dna, Registration, Firearms)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
R.M.D.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences / Sentencing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate global sentence for multiple sexual offences against minors
- 2 Application of Kienapple principle to avoid multiple convictions for same conduct
- 3 Whether sentences should be concurrent or consecutive
Ratio Decidendi
Given the sequential, grooming-based sexual abuse of two minors by a person in a position of trust, and the need for denunciation and deterrence under s.718.01 plus aggravating factors under s.718.02, appropriate global punishment is nine years' imprisonment composed of concurrent sentences within each victim grouping and consecutive application between groups, with conditional stays entered on overlapping counts under the Kienapple principle and ancillary orders for DNA, lifetime registration and a 10-year firearms prohibition.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted by jury; sentenced to nine years' imprisonment; conditional stays entered on specified counts; ancillary orders imposed
Orders
- Conditional stays of proceedings entered for Counts 1, 5, 9 and 10 (Kienapple principle)
- Count 3 (invitation to sexual touching under 14): 3 years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment