Meritt Realty Co. Ltd. v. Brown

Meritt Realty Co. Ltd. v. Brown

The profits were realized as part of a scheme for profit‑making carried on by the company and the properties were acquired with the purpose of turning them to account by sale if necessary; therefore the gains are taxable as income under the provincial Income Tax Act.

Citation
[1932] SCR 187
Parties
Appellant (defendant): Merritt Realty Company Limited; Respondent (plaintiff): Charles R. Brown (Provincial Assessor)
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
9 February 1932
Procedural Posture
Taxation Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for British Columbia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Income Tax, Profit Versus Capital, Real Estate Transactions, Shareholder Control
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Merritt Realty Company Limited

Appellant (defendant)

Charles R. Brown (Provincial Assessor)

Respondent (plaintiff)

Procedural Posture

Taxation Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for British Columbia

  1. 1 Whether profits from sale of real estate held by a closely held company are accretions to capital or taxable income
  2. 2 Whether the company was carrying on a scheme for profit‑making such that gains are income under the provincial Income Tax Act
  3. 3 Whether transfer of property to a company controlled by one shareholder alters character of subsequent gains

Ratio Decidendi

The profits were realized as part of a scheme for profit‑making carried on by the company and the properties were acquired with the purpose of turning them to account by sale if necessary; therefore the gains are taxable as income under the provincial Income Tax Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Assessment of $15,242.18 confirmed as income tax for the years 1926, 1927 and 1929.