R. v. H.R.S.
Judge preferred complainant's evidence over the accused's denial based on opportunity, consistency of key elements, corroborative conduct (report to mother and admissions by accused on two occasions) and accepted that all elements of s.149, s.157 and s.145 were proven beyond a reasonable doubt; accordingly convicted...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 NSSC 193
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: H.R.S.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial Verdict (conviction)
- Outcome
- Accused found guilty on all three counts
- Legal Topics
- Indecent Assault, Gross Indecency, Attempted Sexual Intercourse With Person Under 14, Credibility Assessment, Admissions/confession
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
H.R.S.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Verdict (conviction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the alleged sexual offences occurred
- 2 Whether the complainant's evidence is credible
- 3 Whether the Crown proved each element of offences under ss.145, 149 and 157 of the Criminal Code beyond a reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
Judge preferred complainant's evidence over the accused's denial based on opportunity, consistency of key elements, corroborative conduct (report to mother and admissions by accused on two occasions) and accepted that all elements of s.149, s.157 and s.145 were proven beyond a reasonable doubt; accordingly convicted on all three counts.
Court Disposition
Accused found guilty on all three counts
Orders
- Accused found guilty of indecent assault contrary to section 149 of the Criminal Code
- Accused found guilty of gross indecency contrary to section 157 of the Criminal Code
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment