Vancouver Power Co. v. Hounsome
The company was liable for the contractor's omission to take necessary precautions in blasting under the correlative duty that accompanies statutory authority to construct the tramway; the general release in the conveyance did not bar the respondent's claim for damages caused by negligence. Consequently the appeal was dismissed and damages of $500 awarded to the respondent.
- Citation
- (1914) 49 SCR 430
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Vancouver Power Company; Respondent/plaintiff: James Hounsome
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (negligence/property Damage) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal of British Columbia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Independent Contractor Liability, Negligence, Damages for Property Damage, Release Construction, Exercise of Statutory Powers and Correlative Duty, Blasting/excavation Operations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vancouver Power Company
Appellant/defendant
James Hounsome
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (negligence/property Damage) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal of British Columbia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a company exercising statutory powers is liable for negligent acts or omissions of an independent contractor in blasting that cause damage to adjoining land
- 2 Whether a general release in a conveyance bars a claim for damages based on negligence
- 3 How statutory authority affects strict liability rules (e.g. Rylands v. Fletcher) and imposes correlative duties to prevent unnecessary harm
Ratio Decidendi
The company was liable for the contractor's omission to take necessary precautions in blasting under the correlative duty that accompanies statutory authority to construct the tramway; the general release in the conveyance did not bar the respondent's claim for damages caused by negligence. Consequently the appeal was dismissed and damages of $500 awarded to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment below upheld awarding plaintiff damages of $500
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment