Casella Wines PTY Limited v. Constellation Brands Canada, Inc.

Casella Wines PTY Limited v. Constellation Brands Canada, Inc.

The appeal was dismissed because the prothonotary did not err in exercising discretion to order answers to the discovery questions; the questions were relevant, the defendant's representative had appropriate responsibility and confidentiality concerns can be managed. The bifurcation motion was denied because damages/profits issues are manageable, bifurcation would risk delay and the plaintiff had not yet made an election.

Citation
2015 FC 403
Parties
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Casella Wines PTY Limited; Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Constellation Brands Canada, Inc.
Court
Federal Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark / Intellectual Property / Motions (appeal From Prothonotary; Bifurcation Motion; Discovery)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; motion for bifurcation dismissed; Plaintiff awarded costs.
Legal Topics
Infringement, Accounting of Profits, Discovery, Bifurcation, Confidentiality, Laches, Channels of Trade
Source Language
English
Intellectual Property Trade Mark Law Civil Procedure Infringement Accounting of Profits Discovery Bifurcation Confidentiality +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Casella Wines PTY Limited

Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim

Constellation Brands Canada, Inc.

Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim

Procedural Posture

Trade Mark / Intellectual Property / Motions (appeal From Prothonotary; Bifurcation Motion; Discovery)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the prothonotary's order requiring the defendant's representative to answer discovery questions should be overturned on appeal
  2. 2 Whether a bifurcation order should be granted to try liability first and refer damages/accounting of profits later
  3. 3 Whether discovery questions regarding profits/expenses and provenance of grapes are relevant, overbroad or seek information of a non‑party (Constellation Brands Québec)

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the prothonotary did not err in exercising discretion to order answers to the discovery questions; the questions were relevant, the defendant's representative had appropriate responsibility and confidentiality concerns can be managed. The bifurcation motion was denied because damages/profits issues are manageable, bifurcation would risk delay and the plaintiff had not yet made an election.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; motion for bifurcation dismissed; Plaintiff awarded costs.

Orders

  • The appeal of the order of Prothonotary Morneau dated March 2, 2015 is dismissed.
  • The motion for a bifurcation order is dismissed.