Diageo Canada Inc. v. Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc.
The Court found that Heaven Hill's sale, distribution and advertising of ADMIRAL NELSON'S infringed Diageo's registered trade-marks, depreciated Diageo's goodwill and amounted to passing off; accordingly the Court granted declarations of liability, an injunction restraining specified activities, ordered delivery-up/destruction of infringing materials within 30 days, ordered an accounting and quantification of damages at a bifurcated hearing, awarded interest under the Federal Courts Act and costs to Diageo, and amended the earlier judgment under Rule 397 to clarify the application of declarations and remedies to Diamond Estates as stated.
- Citation
- 2017 FC 624
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: DIAGEO CANADA INC.; Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim: HEAVEN HILL DISTILLERIES, INC.; Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim: DIAMOND ESTATES WINES & SPIRITS LTD. d.b.a. KRISCOTT DISTRIBUTORS
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off / Amended Judgment (rule 397 Amendment)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Diageo: declarations of trade-mark infringement, depreciation of goodwill and passing off against Heaven Hill; injunction and ancillary remedies granted; judgment amended under Rule 397 to clarify application to Diamond Estates.
- Legal Topics
- Infringement, Depreciation of Goodwill, Passing Off, Injunction and Delivery Up, Accounting and Quantification of Damages, Pre and Post Judgment Interest, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DIAGEO CANADA INC.
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
HEAVEN HILL DISTILLERIES, INC.
Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim
DIAMOND ESTATES WINES & SPIRITS LTD. d.b.a. KRISCOTT DISTRIBUTORS
Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off / Amended Judgment (rule 397 Amendment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Heaven Hill's sale, distribution and advertising of ADMIRAL NELSON'S infringed Diageo's trade-marks
- 2 Whether Heaven Hill's conduct depreciated the goodwill attaching to Diageo's CAPTAIN MORGAN trade-marks
- 3 Whether Heaven Hill passed off ADMIRAL NELSON'S products as CAPTAIN MORGAN products
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that Heaven Hill's sale, distribution and advertising of ADMIRAL NELSON'S infringed Diageo's registered trade-marks, depreciated Diageo's goodwill and amounted to passing off; accordingly the Court granted declarations of liability, an injunction restraining specified activities, ordered delivery-up/destruction of infringing materials within 30 days, ordered an accounting and quantification of damages at a bifurcated hearing, awarded interest under the Federal Courts Act and costs to Diageo, and amended the earlier judgment under Rule 397 to clarify the application of declarations and remedies to Diamond Estates as stated.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Diageo: declarations of trade-mark infringement, depreciation of goodwill and passing off against Heaven Hill; injunction and ancillary remedies granted; judgment amended under Rule 397 to clarify application to Diamond Estates.
Orders
- Declarations that Heaven Hill's sale, distribution and advertising in Canada of ADMIRAL NELSON'S infringe and depreciate the goodwill attaching to Diageo's Trade-mark Registration Nos. TMA298,005; TMA409,540; TMA445,025; TMA676,015; TMA676,119; TMA846,828; TMA846,829; TMA848,087; and TMA863,667.
- Declaration that Heaven Hill has directed public attention so as to cause confusion between its wares/business and those of Diageo and has passed off ADMIRAL NELSON'S bottles as those of CAPTAIN MORGAN.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment